mirror of
https://github.com/DarkflameUniverse/DarkflameServer.git
synced 2026-10-02 19:03:43 +00:00
54cd9abd7a
A level object's smashable_loot_matrix replaces the DestructibleComponent LootMatrixIndex when smashable_loot_matrix_set is true or absent and the matrix is not -1, as the client resolves it (LWODestroyableComponent::LoadConfigData 0x00c44cb0). DLU only read the key in BaseInteractDropLootServer, so tagged smashables dropped their template's loot. Resolution in DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix, with tests. No wire change. In game: smash level smashables that carry smashable_loot_matrix_set=1 (11 level objects in the 1.10.64 levels) and ones with a matrix but no _set key; they drop the level's loot instead of the template's. Ordinary smashables (smashable_loot_matrix_set=0) drop what they did before. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
77 lines
2.8 KiB
C++
77 lines
2.8 KiB
C++
#include "GameDependencies.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "DestroyableComponent.h"
|
|
#include "Entity.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
|
|
|
|
// How a level object's config changes its DestroyableComponent, as the client's
|
|
// LWODestroyableComponent::LoadConfigData (0x00c44cb0) and LoadDataFromTemplate (0x00c9f900) resolve it.
|
|
class DestroyableLevelConfigTests : public GameDependenciesTest {
|
|
protected:
|
|
std::unique_ptr<Entity> entity;
|
|
|
|
void SetUp() override {
|
|
SetUpDependencies();
|
|
entity = std::make_unique<Entity>(1, info);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void TearDown() override {
|
|
entity.reset();
|
|
TearDownDependencies();
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, NoSetFactionKeepsTheTemplateFactions) {
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelFactions(*entity));
|
|
entity->SetVar<bool>(u"override_faction", true);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelFactions(*entity));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, SetFactionWithoutOverrideFactionIsUsed) {
|
|
entity->SetVar<std::string>(u"set_faction", "6 ");
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelFactions(*entity), std::vector<int32_t>{ 6 });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, SetFactionWithOverrideFactionTrueIsUsed) {
|
|
entity->SetVar<std::string>(u"set_faction", "4; 6");
|
|
entity->SetVar<bool>(u"override_faction", true);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelFactions(*entity), (std::vector<int32_t>{ 4, 6 }));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, OverrideFactionFalseIgnoresSetFaction) {
|
|
entity->SetVar<std::string>(u"set_faction", "-1");
|
|
entity->SetVar<bool>(u"override_faction", false);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelFactions(*entity));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, NoLootMatrixKeysKeepTheTemplateLootMatrix) {
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix(*entity));
|
|
entity->SetVar<bool>(u"smashable_loot_matrix_set", true);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix(*entity));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, LootMatrixWithoutTheSetKeyIsUsed) {
|
|
entity->SetVar<int32_t>(u"smashable_loot_matrix", 748);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix(*entity), 748);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, LootMatrixWithTheSetKeyTrueIsUsed) {
|
|
entity->SetVar<int32_t>(u"smashable_loot_matrix", 352);
|
|
entity->SetVar<bool>(u"smashable_loot_matrix_set", true);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix(*entity), 352);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, LootMatrixWithTheSetKeyFalseIsIgnored) {
|
|
entity->SetVar<int32_t>(u"smashable_loot_matrix", 227);
|
|
entity->SetVar<bool>(u"smashable_loot_matrix_set", false);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix(*entity));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST_F(DestroyableLevelConfigTests, LootMatrixMinusOneIsIgnored) {
|
|
entity->SetVar<int32_t>(u"smashable_loot_matrix", -1);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix(*entity));
|
|
entity->SetVar<bool>(u"smashable_loot_matrix_set", true);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DestroyableComponent::GetLevelLootMatrix(*entity));
|
|
}
|