Files
yattee/YatteeTests/AccountsScreenTests.swift
Arkadiusz Fal b69fb7fb1f Let the switcher icon say how the account is doing
Only the non-tvOS toolbar menu computed a health-aware glyph; the
settings row and the tvOS button hardcoded the plain outline, so on
tvOS the icon never changed no matter what broke (TV7). One shared
icon now serves all three: outline for Local, filled for a signed-in
account, and an orange exclamation badge when the context needs a
person — credentials rejected, instance disabled, or unreachable.
Transient states like checking stay unbadged so launch doesn't flash
a false alarm.
2026-09-10 22:40:44 +02:00

734 lines
28 KiB
Swift

//
// AccountsScreenTests.swift
// YatteeTests
//
// The accounts screen's two pieces of logic that are not presentation:
// removing an account whose source is gone, and disclosing what deleting a
// source takes with it.
//
import Testing
import Foundation
import SwiftUI
@testable import Yattee
@Suite("Orphaned account removal")
@MainActor
struct OrphanedAccountRemovalTests {
private func makeDefaults() -> UserDefaults {
UserDefaults(suiteName: "yattee.tests.\(UUID().uuidString)")!
}
private func makeScope() -> CredentialIdentityScope {
CredentialIdentityScope(fixedScope: "identity-\(UUID().uuidString)")
}
private func makeInstance(_ type: InstanceType) -> Instance {
Instance(type: type, url: URL(string: "https://\(UUID().uuidString).example.com")!)
}
@Test("An account outlives its source, and knows nothing about it")
func orphanHasNothingToResolveThrough() {
let scope = makeScope()
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let instance = makeInstance(.invidious)
instances.add(instance)
let accountsManager = AccountsManager(
identityScope: scope,
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let account = accountsManager.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
instances.remove(instance)
// Everything the ordinary cascade resolves through is gone with it —
// which is why removal has to go by account ID rather than by instance.
#expect(accountsManager.instance(for: account) == nil)
#expect(accountsManager.capabilities(for: account) == nil)
#expect(accountsManager.orphanedAccounts.contains { $0.id == account.id })
#expect(!accountsManager.selectableAccounts.contains { $0.id == account.id })
accountsManager.removeAccount(account.id)
}
@Test("Removing an orphan deletes the credential filed under its ID")
func removalDeletesTheCredential() {
let scope = makeScope()
let invidious = InvidiousCredentialsManager(identityScope: scope)
let piped = PipedCredentialsManager(identityScope: scope)
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let instance = makeInstance(.invidious)
instances.add(instance)
let accountsManager = AccountsManager(
identityScope: scope,
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let account = accountsManager.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
invidious.setCredential("sid-1", for: account)
#expect(invidious.credential(for: account) != nil)
instances.remove(instance)
var discarded: [UUID] = []
AccountRemoval.removeOrphan(
account.id,
stores: [invidious, piped],
accountsManager: accountsManager,
discardData: { discarded.append($0) }
)
#expect(invidious.credential(for: account) == nil)
#expect(accountsManager.account(id: account.id) == nil)
#expect(!accountsManager.orphanedAccounts.contains { $0.id == account.id })
// The in-memory data goes too, or the account's subscriptions and
// playlists keep answering for an account nobody has.
#expect(discarded == [account.id])
}
@Test("Every store is asked, because the backend is no longer knowable")
func removalAsksBothStores() {
let scope = makeScope()
let invidious = InvidiousCredentialsManager(identityScope: scope)
let piped = PipedCredentialsManager(identityScope: scope)
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let instance = makeInstance(.piped)
instances.add(instance)
let accountsManager = AccountsManager(
identityScope: scope,
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let account = accountsManager.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
piped.setCredential("token-1", for: account)
instances.remove(instance)
AccountRemoval.removeOrphan(
account.id,
stores: [invidious, piped],
accountsManager: accountsManager,
discardData: { _ in }
)
// The instance's type is what said which store to look in, and it is
// gone — so a Piped orphan must be cleared by a caller that cannot know
// it was Piped.
#expect(piped.credential(for: account) == nil)
}
@Test("A deletion queued for the server survives the removal")
func removalQueuesTheTombstone() {
let scope = makeScope()
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let instance = makeInstance(.invidious)
instances.add(instance)
let accountsManager = AccountsManager(
identityScope: scope,
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let account = accountsManager.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
instances.remove(instance)
AccountRemoval.removeOrphan(
account.id,
stores: [],
accountsManager: accountsManager,
discardData: { _ in }
)
// Removing an orphan is a real deletion, not a local tidy-up: without
// the tombstone every other device would keep the account and send it
// back.
#expect(accountsManager.pendingDeletions.contains(account.id))
}
@Test("The deletion is durable before the secret is destroyed")
func removalRecordsTheTombstoneFirst() {
let scope = makeScope()
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let instance = makeInstance(.invidious)
instances.add(instance)
let accountsManager = AccountsManager(
identityScope: scope,
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let account = accountsManager.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
instances.remove(instance)
let store = DeletionOrderStore(accountsManager: accountsManager)
AccountRemoval.removeOrphan(
account.id,
stores: [store],
accountsManager: accountsManager,
discardData: { _ in }
)
// A crash in between would otherwise bring the account back on the next
// launch — signed out, with no deletion owed to any other device.
#expect(store.tombstoneWhenDeleted[account.id] == true)
}
@Test("The pre-revamp instance-keyed item is deliberately left alone")
func removalLeavesTheLegacyItem() {
let scope = makeScope()
let invidious = InvidiousCredentialsManager(identityScope: scope)
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let instance = makeInstance(.invidious)
instances.add(instance)
let accountsManager = AccountsManager(
identityScope: scope,
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let account = accountsManager.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
// The unscoped legacy item is keyed by the instance, and identifying it
// needs the instance — which is exactly what an orphan is missing.
invidious.setCredential("legacy-sid", for: instance)
defer { invidious.deleteCredential(for: instance) }
instances.remove(instance)
AccountRemoval.removeOrphan(
account.id,
stores: [invidious],
accountsManager: accountsManager,
discardData: { _ in }
)
#expect(invidious.credential(for: instance) == "legacy-sid")
}
}
/// A credential store that records what the account manager already knew at the
/// moment it was asked to destroy a secret.
///
/// The ordering is the whole point of the cascade and cannot be observed from
/// its outcome — both orders end in the same state unless the process dies
/// halfway.
@Observable
@MainActor
private final class DeletionOrderStore: AccountCredentialsManager {
private let accountsManager: AccountsManager
var tombstoneWhenDeleted: [UUID: Bool] = [:]
init(accountsManager: AccountsManager) {
self.accountsManager = accountsManager
}
var loggedInAccountIDs: Set<UUID> { [] }
var isScopeResolved: Bool { true }
func setCredential(_: String, for _: Account) {}
func credential(for _: Account) -> String? { nil }
func deleteCredential(for account: Account) { deleteCredential(forAccountID: account.id) }
func deleteCredential(forAccountID accountID: UUID) {
tombstoneWhenDeleted[accountID] = accountsManager.isDeleted(accountID)
&& accountsManager.pendingDeletions.contains(accountID)
}
func migrateCredential(forAccountID _: UUID, fromScope _: String) -> Bool { true }
func deleteCredential(forAccountID _: UUID, inScope _: String) -> Bool { true }
func resyncCredentialsWithCurrentSetting() {}
func setUsername(_: String, for _: Account) {}
func username(for _: Account) -> String? { nil }
func isLoggedIn(for _: Account) -> Bool { false }
func refreshLoginStatus(for _: Account) {}
func hasAdoptableLegacyCredential(for _: Account) -> Bool { false }
@discardableResult func adoptLegacyCredential(for _: Account) -> Bool { false }
func deleteLegacyCredentialIfOwned(for _: Account) {}
}
@Suite("Instance deletion disclosure")
struct InstanceDeletionDisclosureTests {
@Test("A source with no accounts adds nothing to the question")
func noAccountsSaysNothing() {
#expect(InstanceDeletionDisclosure.message(accountNames: []) == nil)
}
@Test("A single account is counted and named")
func oneAccountIsNamed() throws {
let message = try #require(InstanceDeletionDisclosure.message(accountNames: ["me@inv.example.com"]))
#expect(message.contains("me@inv.example.com"))
#expect(message.contains("1"))
// The lead-in would leak its key if the plural variation were malformed.
#expect(!message.contains("accountsWarning"))
}
@Test("Several accounts are counted and all named, one per line")
func severalAccountsAreNamed() throws {
let names = ["first@inv.example.com", "second@inv.example.com", "third@inv.example.com"]
let message = try #require(InstanceDeletionDisclosure.message(accountNames: names))
for name in names {
#expect(message.contains(name))
}
#expect(message.contains("3"))
#expect(message.split(separator: "\n").count == names.count + 1)
}
@Test("The count reads differently for one than for many")
func countVariesWithTheNumberOfAccounts() throws {
let single = try #require(InstanceDeletionDisclosure.message(accountNames: ["a"]))
let several = try #require(InstanceDeletionDisclosure.message(accountNames: ["a", "b"]))
let singleLeadIn = try #require(single.split(separator: "\n").first)
let severalLeadIn = try #require(several.split(separator: "\n").first)
#expect(singleLeadIn != severalLeadIn)
}
}
@Suite("Account status badge")
struct AccountStatusBadgeTests {
@Test("Every status is named, and no two the same")
func statusesAreNamed() {
let statuses: [AccountStatus] = [
.checking, .signedIn, .credentialMissing, .credentialRejected, .unreachable
]
let texts = statuses.map { AccountStatusBadge.text(for: $0) }
#expect(texts.allSatisfy { !$0.isEmpty })
#expect(Set(texts).count == statuses.count)
}
@Test("Only the states the user has to act on are coloured")
func onlyActionableStatesAreColoured() {
#expect(AccountStatusBadge.color(for: .credentialRejected) == .red)
#expect(AccountStatusBadge.color(for: .unreachable) == .orange)
// A credential that never arrived on this device is ordinary — tvOS
// never receives them at all — so it must not read as a fault.
#expect(AccountStatusBadge.color(for: .credentialMissing) == .secondary)
#expect(AccountStatusBadge.color(for: .signedIn) == .secondary)
#expect(AccountStatusBadge.color(for: .checking) == .secondary)
}
}
// MARK: - Switcher glyph
@Suite("Data context switcher glyph")
struct DataContextSwitcherGlyphTests {
private let account = DataContext.account(UUID())
@Test("Local data and a signed-in account read differently")
func healthyStatesAreToldApart() {
#expect(DataContextSwitcherGlyph.systemImage(for: .local, validity: .valid) == "person.crop.circle")
#expect(DataContextSwitcherGlyph.systemImage(for: account, validity: .valid) == "person.crop.circle.fill")
#expect(DataContextSwitcherGlyph.tint(for: account, validity: .valid) == nil)
}
@Test("A state the user has to act on is badged, in the settings entry's colour")
func actionableStatesAreBadged() {
let actionable: [DataContextUnavailability] = [.instanceDisabled, .credentialRejected, .unreachable]
for reason in actionable {
let validity = DataContextValidity.temporarilyUnavailable(reason)
#expect(
DataContextSwitcherGlyph.systemImage(for: account, validity: validity)
== "person.crop.circle.badge.exclamationmark"
)
#expect(DataContextSwitcherGlyph.tint(for: account, validity: validity) == .orange)
}
}
@Test("A context that is still resolving is not a fault")
func pendingStatesAreNotBadged() {
let pending: [DataContextUnavailability] = [.checking, .instancePending, .credentialMissing]
for reason in pending {
let validity = DataContextValidity.temporarilyUnavailable(reason)
#expect(DataContextSwitcherGlyph.systemImage(for: account, validity: validity) == "person.crop.circle.fill")
#expect(DataContextSwitcherGlyph.tint(for: account, validity: validity) == nil)
}
}
}
// MARK: - Switcher labels
@Suite("Data context switcher labels")
@MainActor
struct DataContextSwitcherLabelTests {
private func makeDefaults() -> UserDefaults {
UserDefaults(suiteName: "yattee.tests.\(UUID().uuidString)")!
}
private func makeScope() -> CredentialIdentityScope {
CredentialIdentityScope(fixedScope: "identity-\(UUID().uuidString)")
}
/// The real managers a label is built from, with storage of their own.
private func makeFixture() -> (AccountsManager, InstancesManager, DataContextValidator) {
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let accounts = AccountsManager(
identityScope: makeScope(),
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let validator = DataContextValidator(
accountsManager: accounts,
instancesManager: instances,
toastManager: ToastManager()
)
return (accounts, instances, validator)
}
private func makeInstance(_ host: String) -> Instance {
Instance(type: .invidious, url: URL(string: "https://\(host)")!)
}
private func title(
_ account: Account,
_ accounts: AccountsManager,
_ validator: DataContextValidator,
usernames: [UUID: String] = [:]
) -> String {
DataContextSwitcherLabels.title(
for: .account(account.id),
accountsManager: accounts,
validator: validator,
username: { usernames[$0.id] }
)
}
@Test("A name nobody shares is left alone")
func uniqueNameIsPlain() {
let (accounts, instances, validator) = makeFixture()
let instance = makeInstance("inv.example.com")
instances.add(instance)
let account = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id, displayName: "Work")
accounts.setStatus(.signedIn, for: account.id)
#expect(title(account, accounts, validator) == "Work")
}
@Test("Two sources sharing a name are told apart by their host")
func sharedNameOnTwoSourcesGetsTheHost() {
let (accounts, instances, validator) = makeFixture()
let first = makeInstance("one.example.com")
let second = makeInstance("two.example.com")
instances.add(first)
instances.add(second)
let a = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: first.id, displayName: "Work")
let b = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: second.id, displayName: "Work")
accounts.setStatus(.signedIn, for: a.id)
accounts.setStatus(.signedIn, for: b.id)
#expect(title(a, accounts, validator) == "Work · one.example.com")
#expect(title(b, accounts, validator) == "Work · two.example.com")
}
@Test("Two logins on one source are told apart by who they are")
func sharedNameOnOneSourceGetsTheUsername() {
let (accounts, instances, validator) = makeFixture()
let instance = makeInstance("inv.example.com")
instances.add(instance)
let a = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id, displayName: "Work")
let b = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id, displayName: "Work")
accounts.setStatus(.signedIn, for: a.id)
accounts.setStatus(.signedIn, for: b.id)
let usernames = [a.id: "alice", b.id: "bob"]
// The host is what they have in common, so a host suffix would leave
// the user choosing between two identical rows.
#expect(title(a, accounts, validator, usernames: usernames) == "Work · alice@inv.example.com")
#expect(title(b, accounts, validator, usernames: usernames) == "Work · bob@inv.example.com")
}
@Test("A status the user has to act on is named in the label")
func statusIsAppended() {
let (accounts, instances, validator) = makeFixture()
let instance = makeInstance("inv.example.com")
instances.add(instance)
let account = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id, displayName: "Work")
accounts.setStatus(.credentialRejected, for: account.id)
let label = title(account, accounts, validator)
#expect(label.hasPrefix("Work"))
#expect(label.contains(AccountStatusBadge.text(for: .credentialRejected)))
}
@Test("The identifier is preferred, the host is the fallback")
func disambiguationPrefersTheIdentifier() {
#expect(
DataContextSwitcherLabels.disambiguated("Work", username: "alice", host: "inv.example.com")
== "Work · alice@inv.example.com"
)
#expect(
DataContextSwitcherLabels.disambiguated("Work", username: nil, host: "inv.example.com")
== "Work · inv.example.com"
)
#expect(DataContextSwitcherLabels.disambiguated("Work", username: "alice", host: nil) == "Work · alice")
}
@Test("A name that already carries the host does not repeat it")
func hostIsNotRepeated() {
#expect(
DataContextSwitcherLabels.disambiguated("inv.example.com", username: nil, host: "inv.example.com")
== "inv.example.com"
)
// The identifier still adds something the name does not have.
#expect(
DataContextSwitcherLabels.disambiguated("inv.example.com", username: "alice", host: "inv.example.com")
== "inv.example.com · alice@inv.example.com"
)
}
}
// MARK: - Rename
@Suite("Account rename")
@MainActor
struct AccountRenameTests {
private func makeDefaults() -> UserDefaults {
UserDefaults(suiteName: "yattee.tests.\(UUID().uuidString)")!
}
private func makeScope() -> CredentialIdentityScope {
CredentialIdentityScope(fixedScope: "identity-\(UUID().uuidString)")
}
private func makeFixture() -> (AccountsManager, InstancesManager, DataContextValidator) {
let instances = makeTestInstancesManager()
let accounts = AccountsManager(
identityScope: makeScope(),
instancesManager: instances,
defaults: makeDefaults()
)
let validator = DataContextValidator(
accountsManager: accounts,
instancesManager: instances,
toastManager: ToastManager()
)
return (accounts, instances, validator)
}
@Test("A typed name replaces the fallback")
func typedNameIsStored() {
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
" Main i01 ",
prefilledWith: "i01",
hasUserSetLabel: false
) == "Main i01"
)
}
@Test("An empty field clears the label")
func emptyClearsTheLabel() {
for hasLabel in [true, false] {
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
"",
prefilledWith: "i01",
hasUserSetLabel: hasLabel
) == nil
)
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
" \n ",
prefilledWith: "Main i01",
hasUserSetLabel: hasLabel
) == nil
)
}
}
@Test("Saving an unnamed account's prefill untouched sets no name at all")
func unchangedFallbackIsNotStored() {
// The field starts on the label the row is showing, and on an account
// with no user-set label that is device-local — the login identifier
// only exists where the credential does. Storing it would publish one
// device's fallback to every other device as if the user had chosen it.
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
"i01",
prefilledWith: "i01",
hasUserSetLabel: false
) == nil
)
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
" utest1@i01.v.yattee.stream ",
prefilledWith: "utest1@i01.v.yattee.stream",
hasUserSetLabel: false
) == nil
)
}
@Test("Typing a name that happens to match this device's fallback still stores it")
func editedNameEqualToTheDefaultIsStored() {
// The rule is editedness, not equality with the default. On a second
// device the string that device falls back to is an ordinary name to
// choose — and the prefill there is the *synced* label, so typing over
// it is a real edit that has to store and sync like any other.
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
"i01",
prefilledWith: "Main i01",
hasUserSetLabel: true
) == "i01"
)
// Same on an account with no label yet: the prefill was the fallback
// "utest1@…", and the user replaced it with something else entirely.
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
"i01",
prefilledWith: "utest1@i01.v.yattee.stream",
hasUserSetLabel: false
) == "i01"
)
}
@Test("Saving a named account untouched keeps its name rather than clearing it")
func unchangedNameIsKept() {
// Decided semantics for "Save with no edit" on an account that already
// carries a label: re-state the label. The manager drops the write as a
// no-op, so the name survives and nothing is queued — an idle tap must
// never read as "clear the name".
#expect(
DataContextValidator.renamedDisplayName(
"Main i01",
prefilledWith: "Main i01",
hasUserSetLabel: true
) == "Main i01"
)
}
@Test("Both rename surfaces offer the shown label and fall back to the default")
func renameRequestIsBuiltFromTheValidator() {
let (accounts, instances, validator) = makeFixture()
var instance = Instance(type: .invidious, url: URL(string: "https://inv.example.com")!)
instance.name = "My Invidious"
instances.add(instance)
let account = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
let unnamed = AccountRenameRequest.forAccount(account, resolvedBy: validator)
#expect(unnamed.id == account.id)
#expect(unnamed.defaultName == validator.defaultDisplayName(for: account))
#expect(unnamed.initialText == validator.displayName(for: account))
#expect(unnamed.hasUserSetLabel == false)
accounts.updateDisplayName("Main i01", for: account.id)
let renamed = accounts.account(id: account.id)!
let named = AccountRenameRequest.forAccount(renamed, resolvedBy: validator)
// The placeholder stays the *default*, never the label being edited:
// clearing the field has to advertise where it lands.
#expect(named.defaultName == "My Invidious")
#expect(named.initialText == "Main i01")
#expect(named.hasUserSetLabel)
}
@Test("An orphan's rename request offers only its own label")
func orphanRenameRequestSkipsTheValidator() {
let (accounts, instances, _) = makeFixture()
let instance = Instance(type: .invidious, url: URL(string: "https://inv.example.com")!)
instances.add(instance)
let account = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
let unnamed = AccountRenameRequest.forAccount(account, fallingBackTo: "Unnamed")
#expect(unnamed.defaultName == "Unnamed")
#expect(unnamed.initialText.isEmpty)
#expect(unnamed.hasUserSetLabel == false)
accounts.updateDisplayName("Abandoned login", for: account.id)
let named = AccountRenameRequest.forAccount(
accounts.account(id: account.id)!,
fallingBackTo: "Unnamed"
)
#expect(named.initialText == "Abandoned login")
#expect(named.hasUserSetLabel)
}
@Test("Re-saving the same name writes nothing")
func noOpSaveIsNotWritten() {
let (accounts, instances, _) = makeFixture()
let instance = Instance(type: .invidious, url: URL(string: "https://inv.example.com")!)
instances.add(instance)
let account = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
// An untouched save on an account with no label: nil over nil.
accounts.confirmUpload(account.id)
let untouchedAt = accounts.account(id: account.id)?.updatedAt
accounts.updateDisplayName(nil, for: account.id)
#expect(!accounts.pendingUploads.contains(account.id))
#expect(accounts.account(id: account.id)?.updatedAt == untouchedAt)
accounts.updateDisplayName("Main i01", for: account.id)
accounts.confirmUpload(account.id)
let renamedAt = accounts.account(id: account.id)?.updatedAt
// And on one that carries a label: the same string over itself.
accounts.updateDisplayName("Main i01", for: account.id)
#expect(!accounts.pendingUploads.contains(account.id))
#expect(accounts.account(id: account.id)?.updatedAt == renamedAt)
#expect(accounts.account(id: account.id)?.displayName == "Main i01")
}
@Test("The default name ignores the user-set one, and the shown name prefers it")
func defaultIgnoresTheUserSetLabel() {
let (accounts, instances, validator) = makeFixture()
var instance = Instance(type: .invidious, url: URL(string: "https://inv.example.com")!)
instance.name = "My Invidious"
instances.add(instance)
let account = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
#expect(validator.defaultDisplayName(for: account) == "My Invidious")
#expect(validator.displayName(for: account) == "My Invidious")
accounts.updateDisplayName("Main i01", for: account.id)
let renamed = accounts.account(id: account.id)!
#expect(validator.displayName(for: renamed) == "Main i01")
// Unchanged: clearing the name has somewhere to go back to.
#expect(validator.defaultDisplayName(for: renamed) == "My Invidious")
}
@Test("A rename is queued for upload, and clearing it is queued too")
func renameIsQueuedForUpload() {
let (accounts, instances, _) = makeFixture()
let instance = Instance(type: .invidious, url: URL(string: "https://inv.example.com")!)
instances.add(instance)
let account = accounts.addAccount(instanceID: instance.id)
accounts.confirmUpload(account.id)
#expect(!accounts.pendingUploads.contains(account.id))
accounts.updateDisplayName("Main i01", for: account.id)
#expect(accounts.pendingUploads.contains(account.id))
#expect(accounts.account(id: account.id)?.displayName == "Main i01")
accounts.confirmUpload(account.id)
accounts.updateDisplayName(nil, for: account.id)
#expect(accounts.pendingUploads.contains(account.id))
#expect(accounts.account(id: account.id)?.displayName == nil)
}
}